Home   •  Print this Page   •  

ViewSonic N3252w LCD TV (N3252W)

32" diagonal, 16:9, 1000:1 contrast, $799 MSRP Add to Compare List


Confused? Check out the HDTV Buying Guide!

ViewSonic N3252w LCD TV
User Rating 

5 User Reviews Rated 3.2
Image Quality 4.0
Features 3.2
Construction 3.0
Ease of Use 3.4
Reliability 2.6
Value for Money 2.8

Specs Reviews Rate It Similar Units Related Info
ViewSonic N3252w LCD TV Reviews
5 User Reviews
Nov 14, 2008 Mac
    I found a "great" deal on one of these on the internet from a company in Califor...
Jan 17, 2008 alecfree
    Bought this "new/reconditioned" (w/factory warranty) in May 2008 from buy.com. W...
Oct 28, 2006 raiden
    All in all, this is an ok LCD HDTV, but you get what you pay for. It looks li...
Oct 15, 2006 Raiden
    You can't get any better bang for your buck than this Monitor! I use it as my...
Aug 11, 2006 Wilde
    Purchased this set from Costco Canada for 999.99 CAD. When i purchased there wa...
Oct 28, 2006 raiden 2.3
Image Quality 3.0
Features 2.0
Construction 3.0
Ease of Use 2.0
Reliability 2.0
Value for Money 2.0

My Experience: All in all, this is an ok LCD HDTV, but you get what you pay for.

It looks like a winner but in the end still ends up the big loser.

Trust me.....save your money until you can afford a bigger and better TV/Monitor!

Problems: -Dead pixels within the first wee0k! I have already gone throught 3 exchanges for new LCD for this one and all within a week had dead pixels.
-if you are using this for PC games....forget it. It won't even auto adjust for in-game resolutions and what you are stuck with is a black screen with the words "Out of range"
(has happened everytime on every PC game I have
***to get it to work, you have to uninstall and re-install the game everytime you want to play.......yeah......great.....!!
-did I mention the deal pixels?
-is very LOUD. There is always a humming noise and it interferes with the audio. You have to turn the volume up really high just to hear and when you do, it is too loud for you so you are out of luck.
-the remote control is very unresponsive. You practically have to point it within a foot of the receiver for it too work (yes I put fresh batteries in) which defeats the purpose of having a "remote" control

Free NewsAlert